Watford - Opinion: Why Watford shouldn't stand by Deeney
UK time is: 08:42:57
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Opinion: Why Watford shouldn't stand by Deeney

TROY DEENEY`S sentencing has left Watford Football Club between a rock and a hard place. Of course, losing a talented player is far from ideal in itself, whatever the circumstances, however the moral and ethical implications are huge.

The club will of course not want to wave goodbye to their ~350k investment but in the light of his sentencing, which is the higher price to pay?

For me, as a family club, who pride themselves on their family and community ties, having a convicted criminal on the playing staff is not right. What sort of message does this send out the young children who support Watford and Deeney? If Deeney continues to play for the Hornets after his custodial spell it sends out the message that a criminal record doesn`t matter; that it won`t affect your future employment. Whilst we would all surely accept that football is a law unto itself, that isn`t the right message to be conveying.

Certainly for every job I`ve ever held in the 'real world` I have had to confirm that I do not possess a criminal record and am not facing prosecution for an offence at the current time - if I met either of those criteria, I`d soon discover that finding work became tricky - why should a footballer, in a privileged position, idolised by many, be exempt from this?

The evidence certainly suggests that Deeney will be dispensed with. Whilst Watford do not have a history of criminals within their playing staff, the likes of Marlon King, Ched Evans and Luke McCormick have all been released by their employers in recent times whilst serving custodial sentences.

I have to admit to a degree of surprise in the sentencing. I honestly expected that in our history of weak sentencing, (not that this is right), as a footballer, with a young child and as a first offence, that Deeney would get off with a suspended sentence at worst.

If it was a youth team player or someone who wasn`t central to the club`s plans they would be out the door so quick their feet wouldn`t touch the floor. In the interest of justice, everybody should be treated the same, regardless of stature.

The club will certainly be examining their legal position in all of this and looking at the damage the news will cause to the club`s family image. We might not hear from the club for a few days until all avenues have been explored but I certainly hope the next announcement from the club is to confirm Deeney`s release.

In the interest of balance and the fact that what always have opposing opinions, chrisgwfc will be putting a piece of his own up in the coming days to explain why we shouldn't move Deeney on.
The Journalist

Writer: Tom Bodell Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday June 28 2012

Time: 10:44AM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Oh dear, a guy goes out gets drunk, has a fight is sentenced to jail and now he is not fit & proper to represent our club. Cheap shot comparing Deeney to a Rapist, killer of 2 kids and a man who assaults women! Whilst there is an issue about paying his wages, my opinion is that he has been found guilty by the court of our land and been sentenced accordingly. There are quite a few proffesional players who have been charged with public order offences that you fail to mention, but really to compare Deeney to the ones you mentioned, is really quite appalling.
Report Abuse
28/06/2012 14:04:00

I'm not saying affray is on a par with any of those crimes in terms of severity. I only mention those cases as they are the three most recent cases I can remember, aside from Lee Hughes. What Hughes/McCormick both did was morally reprehensible; Deeney has committed a crime no-where as serious but he has still committed a criminal offence which has landed him a custodial sentence. I can't support that nor him.
Report Abuse
28/06/2012 14:49:00

I understand your point, my argument is that you have taken some of the worse case scenarios and compared them with Deeney. He has done wrong. I would like to know how consistent the sentence given to Deeney compares with others charged with the same crime?
Report Abuse
28/06/2012 20:39:00

Yeah, I'd be interested to see that information too. Hard to know what to make of the sentence to be honest. I think the fact that no-one expected a sentence of this severity speaks volumes!
Report Abuse
30/06/2012 00:12:00


Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
10. Crystal Palace 13 6 1 6 1 19
11. Stoke 13 5 4 4 -1 19
12. WBA 13 5 2 6 -5 17
13. Watford 13 4 4 5 -2 16
14. Swansea 13 3 5 5 -4 14
15. Chelsea 13 4 2 7 -6 14
16. Norwich 13 3 3 7 -8 12

Watford Fixtures (view all)

Breaking League News

Qarabag vs Tottenham Hotspur.
Spurs : 26/11/2015 08:37:00
Manchester United 0 PSV Eindhoven 0
Man Utd : 26/11/2015 07:39:00
Man Utd : 26/11/2015 07:23:01
Nicholas Nkoulou On The Radar?
Norwich : 26/11/2015 07:22:00
Thompson The Match Winner
Norwich : 26/11/2015 07:00:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Man U MotM
Suggested By:  Site Staff
Gomes 1%
Nyom 0%
Cathcart 0%
Britos 0%
Anya 0%
Capoue 0%
Watson 11%
Abdi 0%
Deeney 22%
Jurado 0%
Ighalo 0%
Sub - Ake 66%
Sub - Paredes 0%