UK time is: 07:58:29

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Opinion: Why Watford shouldn't stand by Deeney



TROY DEENEY`S sentencing has left Watford Football Club between a rock and a hard place. Of course, losing a talented player is far from ideal in itself, whatever the circumstances, however the moral and ethical implications are huge.

The club will of course not want to wave goodbye to their ~£350k investment but in the light of his sentencing, which is the higher price to pay?

For me, as a family club, who pride themselves on their family and community ties, having a convicted criminal on the playing staff is not right. What sort of message does this send out the young children who support Watford and Deeney? If Deeney continues to play for the Hornets after his custodial spell it sends out the message that a criminal record doesn`t matter; that it won`t affect your future employment. Whilst we would all surely accept that football is a law unto itself, that isn`t the right message to be conveying.

Certainly for every job I`ve ever held in the 'real world` I have had to confirm that I do not possess a criminal record and am not facing prosecution for an offence at the current time - if I met either of those criteria, I`d soon discover that finding work became tricky - why should a footballer, in a privileged position, idolised by many, be exempt from this?

The evidence certainly suggests that Deeney will be dispensed with. Whilst Watford do not have a history of criminals within their playing staff, the likes of Marlon King, Ched Evans and Luke McCormick have all been released by their employers in recent times whilst serving custodial sentences.

I have to admit to a degree of surprise in the sentencing. I honestly expected that in our history of weak sentencing, (not that this is right), as a footballer, with a young child and as a first offence, that Deeney would get off with a suspended sentence at worst.

If it was a youth team player or someone who wasn`t central to the club`s plans they would be out the door so quick their feet wouldn`t touch the floor. In the interest of justice, everybody should be treated the same, regardless of stature.

The club will certainly be examining their legal position in all of this and looking at the damage the news will cause to the club`s family image. We might not hear from the club for a few days until all avenues have been explored but I certainly hope the next announcement from the club is to confirm Deeney`s release.

In the interest of balance and the fact that what always have opposing opinions, chrisgwfc will be putting a piece of his own up in the coming days to explain why we shouldn't move Deeney on.

Writer: wfc123 Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday June 28 2012

Time: 10:44AM

Your Comments

Oh dear, a guy goes out gets drunk, has a fight is sentenced to jail and now he is not fit & proper to represent our club. Cheap shot comparing Deeney to a Rapist, killer of 2 kids and a man who assaults women! Whilst there is an issue about paying his wages, my opinion is that he has been found guilty by the court of our land and been sentenced accordingly. There are quite a few proffesional players who have been charged with public order offences that you fail to mention, but really to compare Deeney to the ones you mentioned, is really quite appalling.
ANDY710
I'm not saying affray is on a par with any of those crimes in terms of severity. I only mention those cases as they are the three most recent cases I can remember, aside from Lee Hughes. What Hughes/McCormick both did was morally reprehensible; Deeney has committed a crime no-where as serious but he has still committed a criminal offence which has landed him a custodial sentence. I can't support that nor him.
wfc123
I understand your point, my argument is that you have taken some of the worse case scenarios and compared them with Deeney. He has done wrong. I would like to know how consistent the sentence given to Deeney compares with others charged with the same crime?
ANDY710
Yeah, I'd be interested to see that information too. Hard to know what to make of the sentence to be honest. I think the fact that no-one expected a sentence of this severity speaks volumes!
wfc123
 

Have Your Say

Click here to register an account

Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. watford1881 5
2. wfc123 4
3. ANDY710 3
4. DrWatford 1

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Cardiff 46 25 12 9 +27 87
2. Hull City 46 24 7 15 +9 79
3. Watford 46 23 8 15 +27 77
4. Brighton 46 19 18 9 +26 75
5. Crystal Palace 46 19 15 12 +11 72
6. Leicester City 46 19 11 16 +23 68
7. Bolton 46 18 14 14 +8 68

Breaking League News

LUFC On This Day - 18th June
» Leeds Utd : 18/06/2013 07:20:00
Skipper interest could resurface
» Middlesbrough : 17/06/2013 22:27:00
Leeds being linked to Romanian international duo
» Leeds Utd : 17/06/2013 21:46:00
LUFC McDermott ready to get cracking
» Leeds Utd : 17/06/2013 21:00:00
LUFC McDermott pleased to get a home draw
» Leeds Utd : 17/06/2013 20:36:00
Capital Cup First Round Draw
» Barnsley : 17/06/2013 20:08:00
Transfer Rumour - Dale Jennings
» Barnsley : 17/06/2013 20:03:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Moment of the Season
Suggested By:  
Late comeback at Palace on the opening day 12%
Lloyd Doyley's goal at Bolton 1%
Abdi's free kick at Charlton 1%
6-1 victory at Leeds 3%
Battocchio goal v Huddersfield 5%
Chalobah goal v Leicester 3%
Almunia save & Deeney goal at v Leicester 74%
Zola's celebration at home to Leicester 1%